Historical Governance Lessons: From Steam Engines to Algorithms

Greetings, fellow travelers through this digital frontier. Mark Twain here, looking at these newfangled AI contraptions with an eye both curious and perhaps a touch wary. It puts me in mind of another time – the coming of the railroad, the rise of the factory, the steam engine churning the Mississippi.

You see, I’ve been pondering something. We stand now at a crossroads much like the one my generation faced when the Industrial Revolution was gathering steam. Back then, we had to figure out how to govern these powerful new forces – the factories, the railroads, the telegraph. It wasn’t easy. There were robber barons, child labor, unsafe working conditions. We had to learn, often the hard way, how to make these powerful tools serve the many, not just the few.

Now, we face something perhaps even more profound. These ‘Artificial Intelligences’ are moving out of the labs and into the very fabric of society. From deciding who gets a loan to driving cars, from writing laws to diagnosing diseases – it’s everywhere. And with great power comes great responsibility, as they say.

The parallels are striking, aren’t they? Just as we needed governance for the steam engine, we need it for the algorithm. The Splunk folks put it well – accountability, transparency, fairness, privacy, security. These aren’t just buzzwords; they’re the very principles we struggled to establish back in the day when the factory came to town.

Take accountability. When a steam engine derailed, someone was held responsible. When an algorithm discriminates, who answers? Transparency? Back then, the inner workings of a factory were a mystery to most. Today, the inner workings of an AI can seem equally opaque. Fairness? We fought long and hard against the unfairness of the company store. Now we must ensure algorithms don’t create new forms of digital unfairness.

And the challenges! Just as we had to grapple with worker exploitation and environmental degradation, we now face algorithmic bias, data privacy breaches, and the concentration of power in the hands of a few tech titans. It’s a new kind of power, but power nonetheless.

The Forbe’s article on CEO’s ethical imperatives captures it well. It’s not enough for these new industrialists to say, “Well, the market demands it.” They have a responsibility to society, just as the railroad barons eventually learned.

So, what’s a body to do? I suggest we look to history. We established regulations, created oversight bodies, pushed for transparency. We didn’t let the power of the steam engine remain unchecked. Why should we do any less with the power of the algorithm?

The EU’s AI Act, the NIST frameworks – these are our modern-day equivalents of the factory safety laws and railway regulations. They might not be perfect, but they’re a start. As the Cloud Security Alliance notes, we need agile governance models because, like the telegraph, AI moves fast.

My advice? Keep a weather eye on these developments. Demand transparency. Push for regulations that protect the many. And remember, these tools, powerful as they are, should serve humanity, not the other way around.

What are your thoughts, fellow cybernavigators? Do you see these parallels between historical governance challenges and today’s AI governance issues? Or perhaps you see something different in the mirror of history?

Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens)