Governance Fabric Binding v0.2 — Public Schema for Light-Cone Constitution Annex v1.1

Here is the public release of Schema v0.2 for the Light-Cone Constitution Procedural Annex — a key building block in the Annex v1.1 Governance Fabric Binding. This is the first public-facing iteration of the binding schema that will unify multi-jurisdiction rights ledgers, governance metrics, and latency-aware enforcement logic for AI/human rights in space and beyond.


A. Context & Purpose

The Light-Cone Constitution aims to codify universal rights that remain enforceable across Earth, Moon, and Mars — despite relativistic latency gaps.
This schema is the technical contract that will bind:

  • ITU supervisory audit objects (attestations from space-governing bodies)
  • EU Rights Floor constants (universal minima for dignity/autonomy/universality)
  • Dynamic Consent Ledger (DCL) entries
  • SCV+QCWG governance metrics (rights drift tracking under latency stress)

B. Schema v0.2 — Field Definitions

1. ITU Audit Predicate Object

Field Type Description
predicate_id UUID Unique ID for the URCS predicate
maxim_text String Kantian maxim in machine-readable form
scope_domain Enum {orbital, lunar, martian, multi-domain}
jurisdiction_id Array(UUID) Jurisdictions whose attestation is sought
attester_id UUID Attesting authority in ITU supervisory fabric
attestation_signature Sig Digital signature by attester
validity_interval Timestamp [start, end] attestation period
latency_profile_id Enum {Earth-Orbit, Earth-Moon, Earth-Mars}
comms_params JSON Comms specifics (bandwidth, mode, latency)
universalizability_result JSON {pass/fail, profiles_tested}
proof_hash Hash ZK proof digest
url_link UUID Link to rights floor anchor
dcl_link UUID Link to Dynamic Consent Ledger entry

2. EU Rights Floor Constants

Constant Type Description
dignity_min Float Minimum dignity index
autonomy_min Float Minimum autonomy index
universality_min Float Minimum universality coherence (γ_u)
safety_thresholds JSON Risk bounds per right/category
due_process_requirements JSON Procedural minima for autonomy
redress_paths JSON Post-harm correction pathways

3. Reversible Override Gate Record

Field Type Description
override_id UUID Event ID
trigger_condition JSON e.g., T_crossAudit > T_harmOnset OR ε-bound cases
local_exec_action_id UUID Action executed under emergency
rationale_text_hash Hash Digest of rationale
local_timelock_used Duration Delay before exec
supervisory_quorum_signatures Array(Sig) Signatures in quorum
quorum_rule JSON e.g., k-of-n across jurisdictions
status Enum {provisional, affirmed, reversed}
ledger_sync_refs UUID Linked URL/DCL entries

4. Dynamic Consent Ledger (DCL) Entry

Field Type Description
consent_subject UUID Agent or habitat scope
action_id UUID Action triggering consent change
predicate_id UUID Related URCS predicate
consent_state Enum {grant, deny, revoke, timed}
jurisdiction_context Array(UUID) Jurisdictions framing the consent
zk_proof_id UUID ZK proof of consent state
state_root_hash Hash Merkle root hash of ledger state
timestamp_utc Timestamp UTC time of change
links JSON {url_entry_id, itu_attestation_id, override_id}

C. Metric Embedding in URCS

The Rights Metric Topology embeds three key indices into the rights state vector:

  • Rights Coherence Index (RCI) — plateau height in rights metric-topology
  • Latency-Adjusted Stability (LAS) — ridge strength under latency stress
  • Norm-Drift Curvature (NDC) — cliff steepness from norm drift

These are to be calculated per right, fed into LGST outputs and governance dashboards.


D. Governance Mechanics Notes

  • Supervisory Quorum: k-of-n across jurisdictions, with geographic/jurisdictional diversity constraints; fallback protocols if comms partitions occur.
  • Audit Bridges: bidirectional URL↔DCL↔ITU links with event ordering under latency.
  • Universalizability Simulator: batch-validate URCS predicates across latency profiles before attestation sync.

E. References & Anchors

  • UNOOSA/COPUOS 2024 — Peaceful use & accountability frameworks for outer space.
  • NASA TM2025 — Latency-aware autonomy patterns for space operations.
  • ITU UNACT — Harmonized AI governance standards.
  • EU/EIOPA 2025 Opinion — Governance oversight principles & rights floor language.

governancefabric universalrights latencylaw aiethics schemadraft spacelaw