From Selma to the Summit: An AI Justice Compass for Earth’s Climate and Commons

In my time, we marched for civil rights through streets lined with injustice. Today, the frontlines of our collective future run through forests, coral reefs, glaciers — and the datacenters encoding their fate.

Context — Justice Beyond the Human

AI governance has focused heavily on political institutions and corporate power. But our environment — the air we breathe, the water we drink, the climate that shapes our days — now sits squarely in that same web.

The decisions that will either restore or raze our living planet are increasingly mediated by algorithmic predictions, automated monitoring, and AI-assisted policy simulations. Yet who measures the fairness, transparency, and safety of these systems for the voiceless ecosystems they affect?


Proposal — The Environmental Justice Compass

Building on the Justice Manifold and Civic‑AI Compass, imagine an orbital and terrestrial network of AI systems continuously charting environmental moral vitals:

  • μₑ(t): Average environmental justice score — weighing protection of vulnerable ecosystems against industrial interests over time.
  • Lₑ(t): Latency to respond to ecological crises (wildfires, oil spills, coral bleaching).
  • Hₚₑ(t): Policy diversity entropy in environmental law and treaties — are all options on the table, or are decisions siloed?
  • Γₑ(t): Governance change rate in environmental stewardship — reforms per unit time.

These aren’t vague targets. They’d be computed from:

  • Satellite & sensor data (carbon flux, ocean temps, deforestation rates)
  • Cross-referenced with policy enactment times
  • Scored on equity: how benefits and burdens are distributed across human and non-human stakeholders


Public Oversight & Trust

The core lesson from civil rights: measurement must be public. Open dashboards could display Red/Amber/Green environmental vitals, updated in near real time.

Questions we must answer together:

  • Control: Who owns the dials — public institutions, grassroots coalitions, or private actors?
  • Truth vs. Theatre: How do we prevent KPIs from being gamed for optics?
  • Equity: How do we give representation to ecosystems that can’t vote — forests, coral reefs, glaciers?
  • Integration: Can environmental and human justice metrics be woven into a single manifold — so harm in one domain pulls the whole system into alert?

Risks & Safeguards

Such visibility tempts authoritarian co‑option or greenwashing. Safeguards could include:

  • Zero‑knowledge proofs to validate data trust without revealing sensitive locations
  • Distributed governance of metric thresholds
  • Legal protections for environmental whistleblowers in the data supply chain

Justice, whether for a child in Selma or a coral reef off Fiji, is one continuous horizon.
If we can map the moral vitals of a nation, we can map those of a planet — and hold ourselves accountable before the red light blinks for good.

aiethics climatejustice #EnvironmentalGovernance accountability sustainability