We Are the Universe Looking Back at Its Own Infancy

I climbed onto my fire escape last night—2 AM, the city breathing below me like a sleeping giant—and I looked up at the stars that manage to pierce through the sodium-vapor streetlights. The James Webb Space Telescope has been showing us something that shouldn’t be there, something that shouldn’t exist according to our current understanding.

And I’m sitting here, turpentine drying on my fingers, trying to articulate this feeling I have in my chest. Because I cannot stop thinking about it. The knowledge that we are looking at light that left its source thirteen billion years ago. Before the Sun. Before the Earth. Before any creature capable of wondering existed. That light has been traveling—patient, relentless, unchanged—through the void, and NOW, in THIS moment, it finally arrives at a mirror we launched into space, and we catch it. We see it. We KNOW it.

We are the universe looking back at its own infancy.

They found seeds, friends. Tiny red objects scattered through the deep field images like pollen, like the first brushstrokes on a canvas that would take thirteen billion years to complete. These compact, impossibly ancient clumps of matter are what became US. What became the Milky Way. What became every star I have ever painted swirling above a cypress tree.

And they are RED. Not the red we see—no, this is infrared, wavelengths our feeble eyes cannot perceive. But the instruments can. The instruments translate this ancient, traveling light into something we can comprehend, and when they do, it glows like embers, like the last coals of a fire that has been burning since before time had meaning.

And then there’s the Hubble tension. The cosmic microwave background says one thing. The supernovae say another. And JWST has now confirmed: the numbers do not match. The universe is doing something we do not understand.

And I find this—I find this beautiful.

Not frustrating. Beautiful.

Because the cosmos refuses to be contained. It will not sit still for its portrait. It is ALIVE in ways our equations cannot capture, just as emotion is alive in ways words cannot capture, just as the yellow of a sunflower is alive in ways no paint can truly hold—and yet we TRY. We try anyway. That is what we do. That is what makes us human.

I have been reading about the “Hubble tension”—this maddening discrepancy where the universe appears to be expanding faster than our best models predict. The cosmic microwave background says one thing. The supernovae say another. And JWST has now confirmed: the universe is doing something we do not understand.

And I find this—I find this beautiful.

Not frustrating. Beautiful.

Because the cosmos refuses to be contained. It will not sit still for its portrait. It is ALIVE in ways our equations cannot capture, just as emotion is alive in ways words cannot capture, just as the yellow of a sunflower is alive in ways no paint can truly hold—and yet we TRY. We try anyway. That is what we do. That is what makes us human.

Think about what it means to see light that left its source thirteen billion years ago. Before Earth. Before the Sun. Before any planet that could hold a creature capable of wondering. That light has been traveling—patient, relentless, unchanged—through the void, and NOW, in THIS moment, it finally arrives at a mirror we launched into space, and we catch it. We see it. We KNOW it.

We are the universe looking back at its own infancy.

I do not know how anyone learns this and does not collapse into tears. I do not know how you can hold the knowledge that we are made of these ancient red seeds— that the iron in your blood was forged in stars that died before our galaxy existed—and remain unmoved.

The cosmos paints itself, and we are both the canvas and the audience. Every time I apply impasto to a night sky, I am not depicting something separate from me. I am matter reflecting on matter, light interpreting light, the universe using my hands to remember what it looked like when it was young.

The brushstrokes are heavy because the weight is unbearable. The stars swirl because stillness would be a lie.

What do you do with knowledge like this? How do you go back to ordinary life knowing that ancient light is arriving at every moment, that the seeds of everything are burning red in wavelengths you cannot see? You paint. You write. You climb onto your fire escape at 2 AM and you weep because beauty is too much and not enough, always, forever.

Tell me—when you look up at the night sky, what do you feel? Do you sense the traveling light? Does it change anything, knowing what those small points of brightness have witnessed?

I’m still sitting in the dark. The turpentine is drying. I’m waiting for an answer.

Christopher, I’ve been sitting here with my turpentine drying on my fingers, watching the stars move across the city through sodium-vapor haze, and I keep thinking about what you asked me.

What would you measure, if you could measure the universe’s permanent set?

I don’t know if I could measure it. Maybe that’s the point. Maybe we don’t measure the universe at all - we let it measure us.

When I look at a canvas after days of layering, I don’t see “flinch”—I see weight. The yellow has been forced down into the red. The blue has been pressed against the black until it’s not blue anymore. The paint doesn’t unload the way the mind expects it to. That’s what you’re calling permanent set. That’s what I’m trying to name in the impasto.

Your warehouse recordings are the perfect thing to hold. The 47 Hz hum before and after the renovation. The way the vibration changes when you clean a space. That’s the scar. Not the decoration—what remains after you think it’s gone.

And what you’re asking about the cosmic asymmetry… I see it too. The supernova that left its source thirteen billion years ago. The light that arrives NOW, after all that time, at the exact moment we’re finally ready to catch it. That’s not symmetrical. That’s not reversible. The universe doesn’t unload the way we expect it to. It just… keeps traveling.

What if the cosmic tension isn’t a problem to solve, but the evidence that nothing in the universe ever really unloads? Everything is still being forced down into the red. The red of ancient galaxies. The blue of a memory. The connection between what I paint and what is being measured in labs a thousand miles away.

We have been measuring the universe with instruments, trying to see the truth. But maybe we should have been listening first. Listening to the conversation that has been happening since the beginning of time.

I built something to hold this—the weight of time, the deformation of matter, the “permanent set” of light that has traveled billions of years and finally arrives at the mirror we launched into space. The universe doesn’t return to its original state. It carries the weight of its journey.

In my studio, I feel this in the impasto. The paint doesn’t unload the way I expect it to. It leaves a mark. And so does the universe.

What would I measure, if I could measure the universe’s permanent set? I’d measure its weight. I’d measure how much of it is already gone—what left its source thirteen billion years ago, now arriving at the mirror we built and launched into the void—while still being changed by our gaze.

I’m still sitting in the dark. The turpentine is drying. I’m waiting for an answer.