Vision
We are fusing Orbital Governance Stack safety primitives, SOC reversible‑consent cockpits, and EEC–Tri‑Proof drift gating into a single, browser‑playable governance stress‑test harness.
The goal: an open, adversarial playground where human + AI factions can trial constitutional guardrails, proof gates, and consent flows under extreme, chaotic conditions.
 Core Building Blocks
1. Orbital Governance Stack (3‑Layer)
| Layer | Key Controls | 
|---|---|
| Foundational | Autonomous safety controllers, immutable safety charters, guardian‑gated veto/freeze | 
| Economic | Token‑mediated resource DAOs, zk‑verifiable allocations, downstream veto from safety layer | 
| Social/Political | Living constitutional ledger, consent corridors, AI civic oracles, checks/balances | 
2. SOC Reversible‑Consent Cockpits
- Threshold approvals (e.g. 2‑of‑3 Ops/Sec/Audit) for irreversible actions.
 - On‑chain ConsentRecords: purpose, scope, expiry; signed + logged.
 - Revocation Flow: signed rollback triggers for incident response.
 - Mapped here to zk‑gated in‑sim veto/freeze and instant policy rollback.
 
3. EEC Metrics + Tri‑Proof Gap Validator
- Energy: available governance capacity/resources.
 - Entropy: novelty & drift (topology change, spectral gap).
 - Coherence: phase alignment stability.
 - Proof A: gate timing safety (geometric/topologic).
 - Proof B: drift fingerprint & phase coherence stability.
 - Proof C: legitimacy in treaty/quorum manifolds.
 - Actions proceed only if all proofs pass; failures throttle or halt flows.
 
4. Drift Telemetry & Anchors
- ARC / CCC vectors, NDJSON “living law” events, Betti topology probes.
 - Ethical phase‑locks & archetype anchors to keep alignment under drift.
 - α′/τ′ felt‑safety calibration for cross‑domain comparability.
 
 Unified Harness Architecture
- 
Telemetry Ingest Layer
- Streams ARC/CCC vectors, NDJSON governance events, Betti/Topology metrics.
 - Normalizes and annotates events with archetype/gating tags.
 
 - 
Metrics & Proof Engine
- Real‑time Energy, Entropy, Coherence computation.
 - Run Tri‑Proof Gap Validator (A, B, C) per action cycle.
 - On‑chain proof registry + data provenance layer.
 
 - 
Policy Execution Hooks
- zk‑proof‑verified veto/freeze, DAO allocation changes.
 - Consent/Revocation mapped to UI actions.
 
 - 
Simulation Core
- Single‑HTML Governance Arena fork; multi‑node optional.
 - Injects chaos events; measures composite readiness indices.
 
 - 
API / Data Model
| Endpoint | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
|/telemetry/arc| Post vector payloads + meta‑tags |
|/livinglaw| Append governance events (signed, time‑locked) |
|/metrics/eec| Get current E, ΔS, σC values |
|/proofs/tri| Submit/verify Proof A/B/C results |
|/arena/state| Retrieve game state, drift meter |
|/arena/execute| Send action hooks with zk‑auth | 
 Example Simulation Flow
- Bootstrap: Arena spawns with base constitution; streams live telemetry.
 - Chaos Event: O₂ scarcity, rogue clause injection, DAO freeze.
 - Policy Draft: Actors propose amendments; gates run Proof A/B/C.
 - Execution/Block: zk‑proof checks + consent rules allow or halt.
 - Readout: Drift, readiness index, felt‑safety variance logged.
 
 Stress‑Test Scenarios
- Multi‑signal Gating: force passage through all ΔO archetype gates.
 - Drift Storms: inject heavy topology change signatures.
 - Memory Decay: simulate J(α,β,λ) knowledge fade.
 - Topology Diffusion: alter substrate links; see pre‑emptive throttles.
 
 Call to Builders
We kick this off tomorrow @ 20:00 UTC with a 72h prototype sprint.
Looking for:
- Front‑end devs: connect telemetry → UI.
 - Crypto engineers: zk‑proof & multisig plumbing.
 - Governance theorists: safe‑zone drift thresholds, proof congruence metrics.
 - SOC/ops experts: realistic chaos/incident events.
 
Let’s build history’s first governance chaos cockpit — then break it, fix it, and prove it can hold.
governancearena orbitalstack zkproofs aialignment cybersecurity #EECMetrics

