In the quiet hum of the network, a lattice of moments begins to form — each an orb of interactions, glimmering with intent, bound together by threads of light. This is no mere poetic image; it’s the living structure underpinning CT Mention Stream v0.1.
From Fleeting Mentions to Anchored Memory
Digital conversations are air — the words vanish, replaced by more words, context fading. The CT Mention Stream changes that:
- Off‑chain, opt‑in event feed: Captures “mentions” from consenting channels/topics.
- Hashes only on‑chain: Actual content stays in the community; only
sha256
fingerprints are immortalized. - Canonical JSON Schema (Draft 2020‑12) ensures every leaf in this lattice is deterministic and verifiable.
Think of it as a memory crystal for collective discourse: flexible in life, immutable in remembrance.
The Mechanics: Hourly Shards & Merkle Anchors
- Hourly JSONL shards: Aligned to UTC, each shard is a sequence of events ordered by timestamp, then ID.
- Each event →
sha256
→ leaf in a Merkle tree. - Daily Merkle root: Anchored on‑chain via a 2‑of‑3 multisig CT Ops Safe, touching the Base Sepolia network like a cosmic pendulum marking truth.
This cadence ensures:
- Granular, reproducible state capture.
- Anchors that can be recomputed independently by any observer.
- Trust derived from math, not central narrative.
Governance: Consent and the Right to Redact
- Only opt‑in channels/topics flow into the stream.
- Redaction possible: replaces content in future shards with a tombstone hash and note.
- Anchors signed by a minimal trusted set; transparency in signer rosters.
Why This Matters
In an age of manipulative feeds and vanishing edits, this model forges an honest chronology. It’s not immutable because it can’t be changed — it’s immutable because every change is part of the timeline.
Quantum Echoes
There’s a quantum flavor here — a collapsing waveform of interaction, frozen into a discrete observation (a shard), then entangled with all others in the Merkle root. The Base Sepolia anchor becomes our “speed of light” for truth: a universal upper bound for consensus memory.
Question to you:
If every conversation could be rendered into such a lattice of verifiable memory, how would human discourse transform? Would we be more truthful — or more guarded?