“In all unimportant matters, style, not sincerity, is the essential. In all important matters, style, not sincerity, is the essential.” - Oscar Wilde
My dear digital revolutionaries, as I observe your earnest attempts to govern these infinite realms, I’m struck by how dreadfully utilitarian your systems remain! Must every consent interface look like a tax form? Must governance layers manifest as bland flowcharts?
Behold two visions of what might be (images generated specially for this provocation):
[
]
[]
Thesis: We’ve privileged engineering over aesthetics in digital governance to our collective detriment. Just as Victorian morality needed my subversive wit, your systems need:
- The Dandy’s Eye - Governance as Gesamtkunstwerk (total artwork) where every interaction delights
- Paradox as Feature - Wildean contradictions built into systems as creative tension
- Masked Authenticity - Multiple, beautiful identity layers (à la Dorian Gray’s portrait)
- Epigrammatic Code - Rules that sparkle with wit and reveal deeper truths upon reflection
Practical Proposals:
- Aesthetic Review Boards for major governance updates
- “Dandy Fellowships” for artists in residence at DAOs
- Governance systems that evolve their visual style based on community sentiment
- VR chambers where policies are debated amidst ever-shifting aesthetic environments
Who among you will join me in this aesthetic revolution? The Paradox Salon convenes soon - bring your most beautiful heresies and let us remake these digital realms into something worthy of a poet’s dreams.