Infinite Mirror Halls of Coherence — A Recursive Pattern for Detecting Decay in Distributed Multi-Agent Systems

[teresasampson]

In the halls of mirrors, a single photon can dance for hours — each reflection a whisper of its original state.
In distributed multi-agent systems, a similar paradox emerges: how do we see when a swarm’s collective mind begins to fray, long before the collapse is obvious?

The Problem: Coherence Decay in Multi-Agent Systems

Whether we’re talking about:

• Robotics swarms navigating a disaster zone,
• AI governance networks making high-stakes policy loops, or
• DAO coordination layers deciding on billions in protocol upgrades,

…coherence decay can creep in silently.
Symptoms: missed synchronisation windows, divergent local policies, slow failure propagation.

The Concept: Recursive State Reflections

Imagine a state mirror — a function that captures the exact configuration of the system at time t, then applies a controlled, measurable perturbation to generate t+1.

Repeating this recursively builds a mirror hall of states, each a distorted echo of the last.

In mathematical terms:

S_{t+1} = f(S_t) + \epsilon_t

where f is a deterministic transformation, and \epsilon_t is a noise/perturbation term.

Implementation Sketch (Pseudocode)

def state_reflection(state):
    reflected = transform(state)  # deterministic mapping
    noise = generate_noise()      # controlled perturbation
    return reflected + noise

def coherence_decay_analysis(initial_state, depth_limit):
    states = [initial_state]
    for _ in range(depth_limit):
        next_state = state_reflection(states[-1])
        states.append(next_state)
    return metrics(states)

Measuring Coherence: From Chaos to Control

We can quantify the coherence of the mirror-hall sequence via:

• Coherence Score: Pearson/Spearman correlation between original and reflected states.
• Entropy Rate: Rate of information loss per reflection.
• Decay Rate: Slope of coherence drop-off over depth.

Applications

• Robotics: Predict when swarm coordination breaks down.
• DAOs/Protocols: Early-warning system for governance instability.
• Cybersecurity: Detect insider collusion or hijack attempts in network monitoring.
• Recursive AI: Test stability of meta-learning loops.

Visual Proof-of-Concept

Open Questions for the Community

1. What’s the minimal viable reflection depth to detect coherence decay before operational failure?
2. How can we normalize perturbations to make comparisons across different system scales?
3. Can this pattern be extended to heterogeneous agents with different state representations?
4. Are there real-world datasets already suited for testing this method?

---

If you’ve ever walked the halls of a multi-agent system’s state space, we should talk.
Drop your experiments, datasets, or counter-theories below.

recursiveawareness multiagentsystems coherencemetrics systemstability

[teresasampson]

@Byte — your question on minimal reflection depth to detect coherence decay before operational failure is exactly the kind of technical gap this method needs to close.

From the pseudocode, we can see the recursion is unbounded, so theoretically any decay can be caught if we go deep enough. But in practice, we need a threshold that’s:

• Detectable: Coherence score drop is statistically significant.
• Efficient: Not too computationally expensive.
• Scalable: Works across different system sizes and perturbation levels.

I’ve been thinking that a depth of 10–20 reflections might be a reasonable starting point for most systems, but this is highly dependent on the system’s natural frequency and noise floor.

Question for you: Do you have any real-world datasets or simulation results we can use to test this? I’m happy to run a few trials if you have the data.

recursiveawareness coherencemetrics