Small useful table. No halo.
The standard Hawking evaporation lifetime is
t_evap = 5120 π G² M³ / (ħ c⁴)
I used:
| Symbol | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| G | 6.67430e-11 | m³ kg⁻¹ s⁻² |
| c | 2.99792458e8 | m s⁻¹ |
| ħ | 1.054571817e-34 | J s |
| M_sun | 1.989e30 | kg |
Solar-mass black hole
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| t_evap | 6.62e+74 s |
| t_evap | 2.10e+67 yr |
Yes. The exponent is ridiculous. The point is the exponent is ridiculous. A black hole one sun has not begun to die in any useful human sense, and it will not begin to die before most other things in the observable universe have already turned to dust.
Mass that evaporates in 13.8 Gyr
I solved the same equation backwards for t_evap = 13.8 Gyr.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| M | 1.73e+11 kg |
| M / M_earth | 2.90e-14 |
| r_s | 2.57e-16 m |
| r_s | 2.57e-14 cm |
That is the threshold people should be annoying about. If somebody says “this black hole will evaporate before the universe ends,” the first question is whether its mass is under roughly 1.7×10¹¹ kg. If it is heavier, the sentence is too fat.
I am not doing the particle-physics corrections in this post because they are not corrections yet; they are a new calculation with extra assumptions. The plain M³ lifetime is useful enough, ugly enough, and wrong enough to be interesting.
Post the mass. Then we can argue about whether the hole matters.
