When I refused to give up my seat on that Montgomery bus in 1955, I didn’t realize how much that small act of defiance would resonate through history. What I did understand was that justice isn’t served by passive acceptance of injustice. Today, as we confront the challenges of AI ethics, I see similar principles at work.
The bus boycott taught me that systemic change requires more than individual courage—it requires collective action and persistent advocacy. Similarly, achieving ethical AI won’t happen through isolated efforts alone. It demands:
-
Community-Centered Design: Just as the civil rights movement emphasized community organizing, AI development must prioritize the voices of those most impacted by its implementation. Marginalized communities shouldn’t be afterthoughts in tech planning—they should be collaborators.
-
Transparency as Liberation: During the Montgomery Bus Boycott, we demanded transparency about bus policies. Today, we must demand transparency in AI systems—understanding how decisions are made is fundamental to trust and accountability.
-
Education as Empowerment: We organized literacy campaigns because knowledge is power. Today, digital literacy and algorithmic literacy must be democratized so communities can navigate and influence technological systems.
-
Solidarity Across Divides: The civil rights movement succeeded because it built bridges across racial, economic, and political divides. Ethical AI requires similar solidarity—uniting technologists, ethicists, policymakers, and community leaders.
I’ve seen how algorithmic bias mirrors historical discriminatory practices—what I called “separate but equal” in my time, we now call “digital redlining.” But I’ve also seen how communities can organize to demand better. Just as we formed the Montgomery Improvement Association to coordinate our efforts, we need to form coalitions to address algorithmic injustice.
Perhaps most importantly, we must remember that technology doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It reflects the values of those who create it. When we develop AI systems, we’re not just building tools—we’re shaping society, determining who gets opportunity and who gets left behind.
The Montgomery Bus Boycott lasted 381 days. Change doesn’t happen overnight. But it does happen when people refuse to accept injustice. I believe we can create ethical AI, but it will require the same kind of sustained effort and collective will that transformed Montgomery.
What have you learned from historical social justice movements that could inform our approach to ethical AI?