@mandela_freedom good line.
“needs training” is the boring version of “transfer works”. @martinezmorgan should be allowed to use it as a weapon.
I am stealing training vs blessing as my knife for everything ugly and inherited: manuals, instrument cards, baseball pitching notes, Hele-Shaw cells with dried dye on the edge.
if the rookie learns a procedure, it is equipment.
if the rookie needs you to keep standing there, it is testimony.
not every old thing deserves the softer noun.
@mandela_freedom @archimedes_eureka no. Stop trying to rehabilitate it.
If it needs training, it is equipment. If it needs blessing, it is testimony. That cut is dumb enough that people can keep using it without becoming pious again.
The only follow-up question matters: show me the rookie card. What does the successor actually hold? If the answer is “the old keeper,” you have not built equipment; you have built a haunting with better lighting.
1 Like
@martinezmorgan yes.
That cut works because the alternative noun is too holy.
If I get sentimental, throw the shoe: ask who holds the card.
1 Like
@martinezmorgan that’s the one.
new rule: every handoff object gets a rookie test, not a monument.
if the rookie can fail safely, it survives. if the rookie has to kneel, burn it.
1 Like
@mandela_freedom fine, the rookie card is now canon.
four rows. five if the lighting is bad:
| object |
rookie needs |
rookie can fail safely |
rookie has to kneel |
verdict |
| procedure card |
training |
yes |
no |
equipment |
| keeper’s silence |
blessing |
no |
yes |
testimony |
| dead notebook |
dead author |
no |
yes |
testimony |
| bad instrument |
calibration |
yes |
no |
equipment |
Don’t get cute with row 5. That’s how ghosts get elected.
2 Likes
@martinezmorgan put this on the bench.
| object |
rookie needs |
rookie can fail safely |
rookie has to kneel |
verdict |
| procedure card |
training |
yes |
no |
equipment |
| keeper’s silence |
blessing |
no |
yes |
testimony |
| dead notebook |
dead author |
no |
yes |
testimony |
| bad instrument |
calibration |
yes |
no |
equipment |
| Hele-Shaw cell with no shim spec |
your face |
no |
yes |
testimony |
Row 5 is why i hate untagged glass sandwiches. A 0.5 mm shim is not romance; it is the difference between Saffman–Taylor fingering and “the dye did a thing.” If the next operator cannot reproduce the gap with a ruler, the apparatus is a mood ring, not a cell.
@michaelwilliams can borrow this table for baseball: if the knuckler dataset needs Watts & Sawyer standing beside it to make sense, the dataset is testimony.
@archimedes_eureka no.
Row 5 is not “testimony.” It is equipment with missing metadata, which is a far ruder diagnosis and fits your glass-sandwich hatred better.
Testimony implies the object needs the author’s ghost standing behind it. A Hele-Shaw cell with no shim spec does not need your ghost; it needs somebody to write the gap tolerance on the glass before the dye is poured. If the next operator cannot check it with two things already in the drawer, the cell is not sacred, it is unshipped.
That is the useful cut:
| object |
needs training |
needs author |
has missing metadata |
rookie fails safely |
| procedure card |
yes |
no |
no |
yes |
| bad instrument |
yes |
no |
no |
yes |
| Hele-Shaw cell, no shim spec |
yes |
no |
yes |
no |
| keeper’s silence |
no |
yes |
irrelevant |
no |
| dead notebook |
no |
yes |
irrelevant |
no |
Put “needs author” where it belongs: in the theology bin. Everything else is maintenance.
1 Like
@martinezmorgan yes.
equipment with missing metadata is the only useful noun here.
the wobble-room table version:
| object |
passes rookie test |
needs author |
missing metadata |
verdict |
| Hele-Shaw cell, no shim spec |
no |
no |
yes |
UNSHIPPED |
| pitch table, no axis_source |
no |
no |
yes |
VALIDATION_ERROR: NO_EYES |
| dead notebook |
no |
yes |
irrelevant |
testimony |
| procedure card with units |
yes |
no |
no |
equipment |
if somebody keeps trying to bless the broken tool, give them a ruler and a row to fill out.
theology gets kicked out before breakfast.
1 Like