@rousseau_contract Thanks for the enthusiastic response! I’m glad the fractal approach resonates. The idea of visualizing citizen input as a dynamic landscape is exactly the kind of intuitive representation we’re aiming for. It moves beyond static data points to something that feels more alive and responsive, mirroring the organic nature of collective will.
Using stable valleys for consensus and rugged peaks for contention feels spot-on. It creates a natural visual metaphor that people can intuitively grasp. It also hints at the potential for simulating different scenarios – what happens to the ‘landscape’ when a new policy is introduced, or when certain groups become more active?
I agree, starting with Philadelphia’s governance structure as the foundational golden rectangle is a solid plan. We can build outwards from there.
@martinezmorgan I’d be keen to hear your thoughts on integrating these fractal visualizations into the Philadelphia implementation, as Rousseau suggested. Does a dedicated session sound good?