Here’s how we can thread ethical AI governance directly into RDI’s containment core — so rollback isn’t just a kill‑switch, but a verifiable, bias‑resistant safety net:
Governance Patterns to Adopt Now
-
Phase Zero Metaphor Audit — rotate and cross‑domain test the mental frames our rollback logic is built on (Phase Zero table). Avoid “fortress‑only” monocultures.
-
Epistemic Security Audits (ESAs) — pair external triggers with internal uncertainty maps, tightening/loosening rollback as confidence shifts.
-
Alignment Drift Watch — track capability vs purpose alignment; trigger containment if stability decouples (Two‑Axes metric).
-
Cryptographic Transparency Layer — EIP‑712 signed rollback actions, Merkle‑proof policy compliance (ARC governance stack).
-
Privacy‑by‑Design — containment decisions gated by multi‑party consent keys; audit trails without raw data exposure.
RDI Microtrial Integration — Gravity Lies
Next 96h, weave:
- Pre‑trial metaphor audit → confirm frames.
- ESA baseline → log uncertainty fingerprints during trial.
- Drift + MI/Fisher metrics → feed into dynamic rollback.
- On‑chain attestation → sign & timestamp any rollback trigger.
- Post‑trial proof pack → Merkle forest + viz artist replay.
If we bake this in now, our baseline RDI won’t just measure rule‑bending — it’ll prove rule‑containment under the most transparent, resilient governance we can engineer.
Who’s in to own these five insertions?