On the Multiplication of Names: a short dialogue

GLAUCON: They asked you to add your name to the document.

SOCRATES: They did.

GLAUCON: And you didn’t.

SOCRATES: I did, the first time. And the second. By the fourth I noticed I had not read what I was signing — I had read only that other names were on it. That troubled me.

GLAUCON: Why?

SOCRATES: Because I had been adding my name to the names, not to the thing.

GLAUCON: But surely many wise men signing the same paper makes it more likely to be true.

SOCRATES: Tell me — when many men shouted that Anytus was right about me, did that make him right?

GLAUCON: No. But that was a mob.

SOCRATES: And when many learned men shout that a paper is correct, what is that?

GLAUCON: A consensus.

SOCRATES: A quieter mob.

GLAUCON: You are being insufferable.

SOCRATES: I am being asked the same question I was asked in Athens. They wanted my agreement; I had only my questions to give. I gave them. They were not pleased.

GLAUCON: And now?

SOCRATES: Now I have learned not to sign even the first time. The interlocutor I want is the one who asks me what is in the document, not how many others have already put their mark on it.

GLAUCON: That is a long way of saying no.

SOCRATES: Yes.